> > What most of us have to face are more our own limitations > in clarifying our thoughts & then writing them down in good, > clean prose - that more than the range of available formats > in which the stuff can be laid out on the page. > > The charming, distinctive, even exotic, look that can be given > to the most mundane material after a little experimentation with > fonts, layouts, & so on, is something we all discover in the > honeymoon of our first word-processor - or even, in the old days, > typewriter. > > It certainly took me a while to realise that writing is less an act > of seduction than a process of refining[...] I agree with you entirely, but don't think that messing around with conventions is the same as putting a pretty face on a bad or mediocre piece of writing. Gimmicks are always gimmicks, but it is a writer's job to find the Best way to tell a story. The reader will know if it's a gimmick or not. In Slaughterhouse Five, Vonnegut didn't *need* to write certain things in his own handwriting to conceal the ineptness of his writing, but he did because it helped create the atmosphere of a WWII prisoner camp outhouse where all the Americans puked like pigs while the Brits and Germans looked on, disgusted. Brendan ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com