Subject: Re: For Will
From: Jaime Stallard (stallard@SLU.EDU)
Date: Thu May 09 2002 - 16:42:36 EDT
Re: For WillI am a little hesistant to post anything because of the spitefullness being spewed back and forth, I am rather new to the list so maybe it's all just joking among friends. Who knows?? - but here goes:
Obviously Salinger values children and their way of looking at things - we know he loves his women young - and he likes to immortalize children and their innocence, so I completely agree that to look at his stories from a child's perspective is to look at them in a way Salinger would want you to. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think he values a child's perspective much more than that of the corrupt, cynical, and conformist ideals that so many adults in his stories hold.
-----------Jaime
----- Original Message -----
From: Valerie
To: bananafish@roughdraft.org
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: For Will
----- Original Message -----
From: Micaela
To: bananafish@roughdraft.org
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 5:53 PM
Subject: RE: For Will
. I think the closer you are to having the spirit of a child then the closer you are to the spirit of what Salinger is trying to say. Maybe in twenty years I, too, will feel differently, but I hope to god that I don't.
Micaela,
I think we haven't met the same children. Most of those I know are just cruel and careless to other people. I'm reluctant to think that the spirit of child is an ideal. God, I just want to kick their ass! :)
Val
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 17:14:12 EDT