> >Nah, that's not what I'm advocating or describing. What happens if the >government decides to take away your rights, regardless of the vote, >apart from the passage of laws? In other words, I'm describing an >extreme situation, one similar to the situation America's founding >fathers were in. They recognized the fact that they could only pull off >a successful revolution because they themselves were armed. So they made >provisions allowing for a future revolution should a future incarnation >of the American government become as oppressive as the government they >threw off. I was under the impression that the reason our Founding Father declared the right to bear arms was because at the time the 13 colonies didn't have a national militia; instead, we relied on ordinary citizens to fight the British. These citizens needed muskets, etc. Hence the right to bear arms. I doubt Jefferson, et al. would condone the right to own a Saturday Night Special or an AK 47!! --renee