Re: apples

jason varsoke (jjv@caesun.msd.ray.com)
Fri, 07 May 1999 10:38:22 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: XCRUSHx@aol.com: "Re: apples"
Previous message: Alex Rumford: "apples"
Maybe in reply to: Alex Rumford: "apples"
Next in thread: XCRUSHx@aol.com: "Re: apples"

________oOOOo__/~~~~\__oOOOo_________________________________
Jason Varsoke                            jvarsoke@bigfoot.com
For good mental hygiene, shave with Occam's Razor twice daily

On Fri, 7 May 1999, Alex Rumford wrote:

> i was under the impression you could participate in 'both'. The point 
> is , you have to eat the 'apples' (logic, knowledge) and then 
> transcend this logic, because it gets in the way of enlightenment 
> etc. 
> 	why assume that just because you eat the apples, you cant have 
> the pudding? after all, until the age of, what, 16, you're force fed 
> apples every day. why else dyou think it is that the glass kids are 
> so damn intelligent? or de daumier is so talented?
> or am i just picking up fag- ends?...
> 
> 
>

Next message: XCRUSHx@aol.com: "Re: apples"
Previous message: Alex Rumford: "apples"
Maybe in reply to: Alex Rumford: "apples"
Next in thread: XCRUSHx@aol.com: "Re: apples"