Re: Honeymoon?

Subject: Re: Honeymoon?
From: Sean (sean@fojar.com)
Date: Wed Oct 11 2000 - 16:43:32 GMT

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Scottie Bowman: "Re: Muriel, the girl for me"
• Previous message: Cecilia Baader: "Re: Honeymoon?"
• In reply to: scout thompson: "Re: Honeymoon?"
• Next in thread: Scottie Bowman: "Re: Honeymoon?"
• Reply: Sean: "Re: Honeymoon?"

> I did always assume they were on honeymoon, its kind of
> interesting
> to discover that may not be true; like a new find at an
> archeological
> dig. Thanks, list!

OK, if they WEREN'T on their honeymoon, then why does everyone think
that they were? I seem to remember something in one of the other pieces
of writing that talked about Seymour's honeymoon. anyone remember what
it was?

Sean
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH

• Next message: Scottie Bowman: "Re: Muriel, the girl for me"
• Previous message: Cecilia Baader: "Re: Honeymoon?"
• In reply to: scout thompson: "Re: Honeymoon?"
• Next in thread: Scottie Bowman: "Re: Honeymoon?"
• Reply: Sean: "Re: Honeymoon?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Nov 08 2000 - 17:43:40 GMT