On Tue, Oct 28, 2003, rbowman@indigo.ie said:
>    'Sure, Tim.  They have more money....'
Well, I hope I didn't make it sound as if I felt inferior to any of the
specimens paraded before the eye of the camera.  On the contrary, I kept
wondering how all that precious expensive education had turned out so
many dolts.  (Though a couple were touchingly thoughtful and not at all
odious.)
>    (Although I wonder if Hem wasn't as neurotically fixated
>    about money as 'poor Scott' ever was.  He made sure
>    to marry increasingly rich women &, at the end, was as
>    psychotically terrifed of the taxman as any of the millionaires
>    he sneered at on his way up.)
Hemingway's final state was about as useful as if he had put his brain
into a blender for the last couple of years before he blew the thing to
smithereens.  I think his general paranoia about everything was more or
less an indication of the utter disaster of his psyche.  Booze wins yet
again....
>    We all remember Holden's tact in hiding those leather suitcases.
>    (Vuiton?) 
Mark Cross!  Just like Grace Kelly in REAR WINDOW when she stays over
Jimmy Stewart's apartment, though her case was a lot more creatively
strategic than anything Holden managed.
>    But had his angst really all that much to do with privilege?
>    It's always pleasant to drink in the better class bars & mix with
>    girls who adore the Lunts.  But self-loathing, whether of the adolescent
>    or more mature variety, will always find a theatre for its projection
>    - in any part of town.
I thought there was always a touch of discomfort at the "better" life he
led; he always seemed to feel awkward toward the kids who had less than
he had.
But that's true about self-hatred.  It's pretty much the same all over,
isn't it?
--tim
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Tue Oct 28 19:29:15 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Dec 06 2003 - 16:07:44 EST