>Yes, I suppose time is an issue, but access isn't. Newspapers are free >in >the library, student subscriptions can be had for the price of a weekly >Microbrew, TVs are ubiquitious, All Things Considered is on the left >end >of the radio dial, and cnn.com and nytimes.com are just mouseclicks >away. > >I'm not sure what distresses me more: That people my age are so >uninformed >about and uninterested in current events, or the fact that most people >my >age get their news from Tabitha, Kurt and their local news. Sigh. > when i say i don't have time to watch the news, i mean i don't have time to watch tv. i don't watch tv. if i did have the time to watch the news, i would spend it reading salinger or whitman or hemingway or somebody else which would feed my soul a lot more than whatever crappy thing happened to people today. i know i should be more informed about the world and its goings-on, but i'm really quite wrapped up in other things. i guess it comes down to a matter of values, which, while not arbitrary, are not constructive fair game for arbitration.--matt