Re: RE: father, dear father, come home with me now ....
Subject: Re: RE: father, dear father, come home with me now ....
JLSnoop@aol.com
Date: Tue Sep 05 2000 - 19:17:34 GMT
- sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
- Next message: citycabn: "Re: father, dear father, come home with me now ...."
- Previous message: JLSnoop@aol.com: "Re: RE: father, dear father, come home with me now ...."
- Maybe in reply to: Will Hochman: "RE: father, dear father, come home with me now ...."
- Next in thread: Jennifer Besiada: "RE: father, dear father, come home with me now ...."
- Maybe reply: JLSnoop@aol.com: "Re: RE: father, dear father, come home with me now ...."
In a message dated 9/5/00 7:13:45 PM, JLSnoop@aol.com writes:
<<Salinger, like all writers, wanted to
evoke emotion through the common idea of exclusion. >>
I didn't mean to say this exactly. I meant to say that all writers wanted to
convey emotion, and that second part should be a seperate sentence. Oh well,
that's what I get for being a moron.
jake
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
- Next message: citycabn: "Re: father, dear father, come home with me now ...."
- Previous message: JLSnoop@aol.com: "Re: RE: father, dear father, come home with me now ...."
- Maybe in reply to: Will Hochman: "RE: father, dear father, come home with me now ...."
- Next in thread: Jennifer Besiada: "RE: father, dear father, come home with me now ...."
- Maybe reply: JLSnoop@aol.com: "Re: RE: father, dear father, come home with me now ...."
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25
: Sun Oct 01 2000 - 14:44:36 GMT