Daniel, that's a pretty big interpretive leap of my article. No, calls
to "remember 9/11" weren't described by me as a call to vengeance. I
was just providing background for the ideas being presented.
Jim
Yocum Daniel GS 21 CES/CEOE wrote:
> So you assume the call to remember 9/11 is call for vengeance? When
> people encourage each other to remember, it is no different than the
> guilt free Lion King Type vengeance? Interesting leap Jim. There are
> other reasons for remembering. To assume that everyone's reason has
> the same motivation seems to bring us back to our discussion about
> valid and invalid generalizations. Do we want to remember that in all
> it's glory?
> Daniel
>
> Check out my new article at Metaphilm: "/The Lion King/:
> /Hamlet/and the Myth of Happy Vengeance."
>
> It argues that Disney's /The Lion King /is a reworking of
> Shakespeare's /Hamlet/ that reinforces the idea of vengeance as a
> real solution to problems, rather than the final act of a tragic
> chain of events.
>
> http://metaphilm.com/philm.php?id=184_0_2_0_M
>
> Jim Rovira
>
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Wed Sep 17 11:15:58 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Dec 06 2003 - 16:07:05 EST