> I have no way of knowing how true is her description of his rage > at her impending publication. Of *course* he's angry. He's no longer a mystery man. We have penetrated the ivory tower and we've found no Gentleman of Shalott but an eccentric but essentially - or maybe the word should be `believable' - guy. I found the Maynard book at my local esoteric bookstore today - I was very surprised, I didn't know it was out here yet and haven't seen any reviews. I only had a chance to flick through it but found a pretty amusing story about Salinger trying to smoke a salmon by sticking it down his chimney. (: > But I suspect - on past form - if her > report were really contestable he would already have contested it. But what could he contest? Like she said, it's her recollections, and there's no way of copyrighting those, short of lobotomy. Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 THE INVERTED FOREST www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest