Universitatlity

snarf writes: "On the other hand I don't completely agree with Daniel and
Jim: Holden is always Holden despite being read in good and even on quite
bad translations. The character always find its way through."

So, Holden is an incorruptable substance? A Platonic ideal manifested with
tweaks and nuances in English or in Spanish? Would this make Salinger's
Holden itself only one instance of an immutable ur-Holden? Phenomenon vs.
noumenon? Or is Salinger's Holden the thing-in-itself?

Matt

--
mkozusko@ursinus.edu  
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH